Asbestos Exposure at Burlington Generating Station | Burlington, Iowa

An Important Resource for Missouri and Iowa Workers, Families & Former Employees


If you or a loved one worked at Burlington Generating Station and has been diagnosed with mesothelioma, asbestosis, or another asbestos-related disease, you may have legal rights to compensation. Coal-fired power plants rank among the most heavily asbestos-contaminated industrial environments in American history. Workers at Burlington Generating Station may have been exposed to asbestos-containing materials during routine maintenance, repairs, and equipment operations. An experienced mesothelioma lawyer or asbestos attorney can evaluate your case at no cost and in confidence.


⚠️ URGENT: Iowa Filing Deadline Warning

Iowa workers and families must act now. Under Iowa Code § 614.1(2), the Iowa asbestos statute of limitations is 5 years from the date of diagnosis — not from the date of exposure. While this window may seem lengthy, two threats demand immediate attention:

Threat 1 — Pending 2026 Legislation: Iowa Iowa has a strict 2-year statute of limitations for asbestos disease claims under Iowa Code § 614.1(2). That clock starts on the date of diagnosis.

Iowa’s legal landscape for asbestos victims is actively under threat in the 2026 legislative session. Call a Iowa asbestos attorney today for a free, confidential case evaluation. Your right to compensation depends on acting now.


Table of Contents

  1. Facility Overview and History
  2. Why Asbestos Was Used at Power Plants
  3. When Asbestos-Containing Materials Were Reportedly Present
  4. Trades and Occupations Most at Risk
  5. Products Allegedly Used at the Facility
  6. How Workers May Have Been Exposed
  7. Asbestos-Related Diseases: Mesothelioma, Asbestosis, and Lung Cancer
  8. Family Members and Secondary Exposure
  9. Legal Rights and Compensation Options
  10. Iowa, Iowa, and Illinois Statutes of Limitations
  11. Why Choose a mesothelioma lawyer in Iowa
  12. Frequently Asked Questions
  13. Contact an Asbestos Attorney Today

Facility Overview and History

Burlington Generating Station: Coal-Fired Power on the Mississippi River Corridor

Burlington Generating Station is a coal-fired electric power generation facility in Burlington, Iowa, Des Moines County, situated on the western bank of the Mississippi River. Interstate Power and Light Company (IP&L), a subsidiary of Alliant Energy Corporation, owns and operates the facility.

Burlington sits at the geographic heart of the Mississippi River industrial corridor — the dense stretch of heavy industry running from St. Louis northward through Alton, Granite City, and Quincy, Illinois, and into southeastern Iowa. That corridor includes some of the most asbestos-intensive industrial facilities ever built: Labadie Energy Center in Franklin County, Missouri; Portage des Sioux Power Plant in St. Charles County, Missouri; Rush Island Energy Center in Jefferson County, Missouri; Granite City Steel in Madison County, Illinois; and the former Monsanto Company chemical complex in Sauget, Illinois, just across the river from St. Louis.

Workers, contractors, and traveling tradespeople who worked these Missouri facilities often moved between sites across state lines. Missouri-based union workers may have traveled to Burlington under reciprocal dispatch agreements common among Heat and Frost Insulators locals, Plumbers and Pipefitters unions, and Boilermakers associations throughout the corridor.

For decades, Burlington Generating Station supplied electricity to communities across Iowa and Illinois. Like virtually every coal-fired power plant constructed or substantially renovated during the mid-twentieth century, the facility reportedly incorporated asbestos-containing materials (ACMs) throughout construction, operation, and maintenance.

Industry-Wide Asbestos Use in Utility Facilities

Major manufacturers — including Johns-Manville Corporation, Owens-Illinois, Armstrong World Industries, Eagle-Picher Industries, and Combustion Engineering — supplied asbestos-containing products to the utility sector for decades. Asbestos was the material of choice for high-temperature insulation, packing, and fireproofing applications at power plants. IP&L, as the facility operator, operated within this established industry practice during an era when asbestos fiber hazards were either withheld from workers or actively concealed by product manufacturers.

The union locals that supplied skilled trades to Burlington Generating Station and comparable facilities across the Mississippi River corridor included Heat and Frost Insulators Local 1 (St. Louis), Plumbers and Pipefitters UA Local 562 (St. Louis), and Boilermakers Local 27 (St. Louis). Workers from these Missouri-based locals may have been dispatched to Burlington Generating Station under traveling work provisions.


Why Asbestos Was Used at Power Plants

Thermal Demands of Coal-Fired Power Generation

Coal-fired power plants burn coal to heat water in large boiler systems, producing steam that drives turbines. Those thermal conditions drove industry-wide demand for asbestos:

Operating Conditions That Created Asbestos Demand:

  • Boiler temperatures commonly exceeding 1,000°F
  • High-pressure steam lines operating at several hundred degrees Fahrenheit
  • Turbine systems requiring continuous thermal management
  • Feedwater heaters, heat exchangers, and auxiliary steam equipment throughout the facility

Why Manufacturers Sold Asbestos for These Applications:

  • Does not combust
  • Withstands extreme temperatures without short-term degradation
  • Was inexpensive and commercially available at scale
  • Could be formed into pipe insulation, block insulation, blankets, gaskets, packing, rope, and dozens of other industrial products
  • Was aggressively marketed by Johns-Manville, Owens-Illinois, Celotex, W.R. Grace, and Georgia-Pacific — companies that decades of litigation have established knew about asbestos health hazards long before disclosing them publicly

Standard Practice Throughout the Missouri–Iowa–Illinois Industrial Corridor

From roughly the 1930s through the mid-1970s, coal-fired power plants across the United States — and throughout the Missouri and Illinois sections of the Mississippi River industrial corridor in particular — were built and maintained with asbestos-containing materials as standard practice. The utility sector was one of the largest asbestos consumers in the American industrial economy.

The same products reportedly used at Burlington Generating Station were in common use at Missouri facilities including Labadie Energy Center, Portage des Sioux, and Rush Island, and at Illinois heavy industrial sites including Granite City Steel. The manufacturers who supplied those Missouri and Illinois facilities were the same national suppliers who served Iowa utilities.

EPA restrictions and OSHA asbestos standards did not take meaningful effect until the mid-1970s at the earliest. Workers employed at Burlington Generating Station from approximately 1940 through 1980 — including Missouri-based tradespeople dispatched under traveling provisions — may have been exposed to asbestos-containing materials during ordinary work activities.


When Asbestos-Containing Materials Were Reportedly Present

Based on documented history of coal-fired power plant construction and operation in the Midwest, and consistent with exposure patterns at comparable IP&L and Alliant Energy facilities throughout the Mississippi River corridor — including Labadie Energy Center (Franklin County, Missouri), Portage des Sioux Power Plant (St. Charles County, Missouri), and Rush Island Energy Center (Jefferson County, Missouri) — asbestos-containing materials were reportedly present at Burlington Generating Station across multiple periods.

Original Construction Phase

During initial construction of the facility’s boiler and turbine infrastructure, asbestos-containing insulation, gaskets, packing materials, and fireproofing products were reportedly incorporated throughout the plant. Products manufactured by Johns-Manville, Owens-Illinois, and Combustion Engineering were typical of materials used in comparable utility facilities during this period.

Missouri-based union members dispatched under traveling work arrangements from Heat and Frost Insulators Local 1, UA Local 562, and Boilermakers Local 27 may have participated in construction-phase and renovation work at the facility alongside Iowa-based tradespeople.

Operational and Maintenance Phase (Approximately 1940s–1980s)

During routine plant operations, maintenance workers, contractors, and tradespeople reportedly worked alongside and directly with asbestos-containing pipe insulation, boiler block insulation, turbine insulation, and other ACMs on an ongoing basis. Members of Heat and Frost Insulators Local 1 (St. Louis), Plumbers and Pipefitters UA Local 562 (St. Louis), and Boilermakers Local 27 (St. Louis) — in addition to Iowa-based locals — may have been dispatched to Burlington under the traveling work and reciprocal dispatch provisions common among Midwest craft unions serving the Mississippi River corridor industrial complex.

Maintenance and repair work carries some of the highest exposure risk of any activity at a power plant: workers who physically cut, removed, and replaced existing insulation may have released asbestos fibers directly into their own breathing zones.

Renovation and Upgrade Projects

Power plants underwent capital improvement projects, equipment upgrades, and system overhauls on a recurring basis. Each such project at Burlington Generating Station may have involved disturbing previously installed asbestos-containing materials from Johns-Manville, Armstrong World Industries, Owens-Illinois, Celotex, and Georgia-Pacific, potentially exposing both specialty trade workers and general facility personnel. Missouri- and Illinois-based contractors serving the broader Mississippi River corridor frequently provided labor for such projects at Iowa facilities.

Legacy Asbestos Removal and Abatement (1980s–1990s and Beyond)

As asbestos regulation expanded through the 1980s and 1990s, many power plants undertook formal abatement programs. Workers involved in those projects may have been exposed if proper containment and respiratory protection were not provided or enforced.

Under EPA National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) regulations, demolition and renovation of facilities containing ACMs require specific notification and handling procedures. Failure to follow those procedures may have resulted in worker exposure during abatement activity.


Trades and Occupations Most at Risk

Multiple trades faced elevated asbestos exposure risk at Burlington Generating Station. The following occupational groups experienced the highest documented exposure risks at facilities of this type.

Insulators (Heat and Frost Insulators)

Insulators rank among the most heavily asbestos-exposed occupational groups in American industrial history. Members of Heat and Frost Insulators Local 1 (St. Louis, Missouri) and other Midwest locals — including Iowa locals — may have been dispatched to Burlington Generating Station during maintenance, renovation, and capital projects.

Local 1 has historically represented insulators working across the Missouri–Illinois border and throughout the Mississippi River corridor, and its members’ work records frequently reflect assignments to Iowa utility facilities under traveling work provisions.

Alleged exposure activities:

  • Applied, removed, and replaced pipe insulation containing chrysotile or amosite asbestos-containing materials
  • Mixed and applied asbestos-containing insulating cement products
  • Cut and fabricated asbestos block insulation for boiler and turbine systems
  • Worked in environments where asbestos fibers were routinely airborne
  • Handled asbestos rope and felt packing for equipment seals

Pipefitters and Steamfitters

Members of Plumbers and Pipefitters UA Local 562 (St. Louis, Missouri) and Iowa-based UA locals may have performed work at this facility on high-pressure steam and feedwater systems and may have been exposed through direct and bystander contact with asbestos-containing materials on piping, flanges, and valve assemblies.

Alleged exposure activities:

  • Cut into and replaced pipe sections wrapped with asbestos-containing insulation

For informational purposes only. Not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is created by reading this page. © 2026 Rights Watch Media Group LLC — Disclaimer · Privacy · Terms · Copyright